The local church is…
September 6, 2009 | 3:40 pm
People define the local church in many ways. Even in the New Testament, though there are some ecclesiological imperatives, there also seems to be much room for unique structures and creative styles from city to city, and from church to church. Here are a few pictures that help express how as a pastor I see the local church functioning when it is at its best…
A body, not a building or a business: It’s not that we don’t gather in buildings (most of us do) or that we don’t provide good stewardship over the resources that we share (not doing so would lack integrity), but a building is only clothing for the body, and we don’t share the same ultimate goals (profit, year-to-year growth, etc.) as a business.
Organic, not synthetic: Synthetic plants can look good and are a lot less mess, but there is no life in them. Real ministry will be messy because it is real and not fake. If a local church is always polished, smooth, and “perfect” with no sign anywhere of messy people or processes, you’d better look to see if there is any real life happening.
A family, not a factory: I’ve heard it said that a church should create systems that take the inputs (new people) and put them through a discipleship process until they are outputs (sent people) who are equipped to do Kingdom stuff. I agree with the equipping part (Eph 4) but we are much more like a family; we all move at our own pace and nobody gets ‘voted off the island’ even if they are not growing very quickly; or growing at all! Factory language dehumanizes and despiritualizes us—we are not cogs or widgets, we are children of a loving and unfathomably creative God who cares for us in as many unique ways as there are individuals in our congregation.
A movie, not a monologue: I love watching the credits at the end of movies. Good films can’t be made by a single producer, actor or director, as talented as each of those people may be; It takes hundreds of capable people to make it happen. The local church should be like this—everyone is needed! It takes more than the “sage on the stage” or those who are perceived as leaders, but a whole team of uniquely gifted individuals each adds their life to make up this beautiful community called the local church.
Prophetic, not professional: “Professional” ministry requires people who have had specialized schooling or extensive training. Education and training can be valuable, but we know that the professional religious leaders in the time of Acts stood in stark opposition to the disciples who “were uneducated, ordinary men who had been with Jesus” (Acts 4:13). The difference is the disciples carried the heart and words of the Lord (the definition of prophetic) and the religious professionals didn’t.
A doorway, not a destination: The local church is not all about attracting people to a destination every week, but it is to be a portal through which people can be propelled into the world. We come together SO THAT we can be sent out. Church gatherings should never be the goal of ministry, but only the starting line.
About big people, not big churches: The size of a local church is largely irrelevant when it comes to health. Micro-church is valid; so is mega-church. The measure of health can never be discovered simply in attendance numbers or income, but in multiplied life, equipped individuals, impact on a neighborhood or in a city, healed people, submitted disciples, sent leaders, and countless other indicators that often defy our attempts at quantifiable assessment.






I think you might want to add one thing…a huge portion of the New Testament is written to
‘you” (plural). A community where people belong, and also a community where they somehow unite spiritually in a way no other group in the world does…somehow it brings the Spirit of the Lord into their midst in a prophetic/rhema way…the power of the congregational meeting in unity, prayer and worship seems to be a powerful subtext to the letters of the New Testament writers.
Yes, Kean. What you say is the subtext to the NT and my thoughts about church.
My images are flawed and not complete pictures of the mission part of church, but the coming together part is vital and not negotiable.
I have friends who have given up on the commitment to community and gathering part of the local church, and who essentially only buy into the Church (big C) and I respectfully but totally disagree. Congregational meeting (the go to church part) is essential and then what people do as they go away from that is world impacting, too. One without the other is much less than the sum of their parts.
Well done Tim. The desire of my heart is to see God raise up more of those types of communities. Lately we feel like He is asking us to do less “doing” and much more “responding” to Him. We are day by day trusting Him more and more to create the community you’re talking about. It is amazing how He works and weaves the Church and community when you stop trying to manufacture it. It’s sad to me that the typical definition of church and christianity has more to do with presentations and performances. He will build His Church, He is good at it, we are not worried. Bless you guys!
That’s really an honor to hear from you, David. We have deep respect for you and Amy and the journey you are on right now and the people you are becoming. We’re thankful for your friendship.
Tim (and Deborah)
this really resonates with me Tim. Of course, you and I have bantered enough about stuff like this that it would be difficult for it not to resonate. i know that these are not “new-fangled metaphors” to you, but ongoing, ever-deepening realities of how you see and live within biblical community.
I especially appreciate how you broaden the definition of church without somehow (backhandedly) diminishing it.